Wednesday 9 September 2015

Capital budgeting


Capital budgeting


Introduction;

The efficient allocation of capital is the most important finance function in the modern times. it involves the decision to convert the small current funds into long term benefits. Such decisions are of considerable importance to the firm. since they tend to determine its value and size by influencing its growth, profitability and risk.   

NATURE:

Investment decisions of a  firm is generally known as the “capital budgeting” or “capital expenditure decisions”. Capital budgeting is also known as investment appraisal. A capital budgeting decisions may be defined as the firms decision to invest its current funds most effectively in long term assets in anticipation of an expected flow of benefits over a series of years. Long term assets are those which effects the firms operations beyond one year periods. 
The firm’s investment decisions generally include the following.
Expansion: a firm may have to expand its production capacity on account of high demand for its products and inadequate production capacity. this will need an additional capital investment.
Diversification: a firm may be interested in diversifying existing line of activity to reduce risk by operating in several markets rather than in a single market. In such an event, long term investment may become necessary for purchase of new machinery and facilities.
Replacement and modernization: replacement of fixed assets may become necessary on account of there being worn-out or becoming outdated on account of new technology.
Research and development: A huge amount may have to be expended for research and development in case of those industries where technology is rapidly changing.
Miscellaneous: A firm may have to invest money in projects which do not directly help in achieving profit oriented goals. For ex: installation of pollution control equipment may be necessary on account of legal requirements. 

Features of investment decisions:

1)      The exchange of current funds for future benefits.
2)      The funds are invested in long term assets.
3)      The future benefits will occur to the firm over a series of years. 

It is significant to emphasize that expenditures and benefits of an investments should be measured In cash. In the investment analysis, it is cash flow which is important not the accounting profit. it may also be pointed out that investment decisions affect the firms value. The firms value will increase if investments are profitable and to the shareholders wealth. Thus investments should be evaluated on the basis of criterion which is compatable with the objective of shareholders wealth maximisation. An investment will add to the shareholders wealth if it yields benefits in excess of the minimum benefits as per the oppurtunity cost of capital.

Importance of investment decisions     

Investment decisions require special attention because of the following reasons:

Growth: Firms decision to invest in long term assets has a decisive influence on the rate and direction of its growth. Awrong decision can prove disasters for the continue survival of the firm and unwanted expansion of assets will result in heavy operationg costs.
Risk: Long term commitments of funds may also change the risk complexion of the firm. In adoption of an investment increases average gain, but causes frequent fluctuations in earnings, the firm will become more risky.
Funding: Investment decisions generally involve larger amount of funds which make it imperative for the firm to plan its investment programs very carefully and make advance arrangement for preparing finance internally and externally.
Irreversibility: Most of the investment decisions are irreversible. It is difficult to find a market of such capital items once there has been acquired. The firm will incur heavy losses if such assets are scraped.
Complexity: Investment decisions are among the firms most difficult decisions. They are an assessment of future events which are difficult to predict. It is really a complex problem to correctly estimate future cash flows due to economic, social, political and technological factors.

Types of Capital Budgeting:

Independent Projects;  These are the projects which do not compete with one another depending upon the profitability of the project and availability of funds. The company can undertake any number of projects
Mutually Exclusive project : In case of this project acceptance of one project automatically rejects the other project. Example If there are two alternative projects A and B either A or B should be accepted
Contingent Projects : These are dependent projects acceptance of one project depends upon acceptance of one or more other projects For example Investment in machinery is dependent upon expansion of plant or replacement of old machinery.

Capital Budgeting Decision making Process:

Project Generation ;A project is an investment proposal. The first step in capital Budgeting making process is idea generation. Idea generation means identifying the potential areas where investments can be made
Developing the alternatives; Next step is developing the alternative investment proposal for example if an organization wants to replace the existing machineries it has two alternatives either it can purchase ordinary machinery or automatic machinery.

Evolution of alternatives: Next crucial stage it to estimate the cash outflows required for proposed investment and expected benefits over a period of time for each alternative. The problem with estimation of cash outflows is about certainty and uncertainty. The outflows required for an investment proposal can be estimated more or less accurately. After estimating cash flows evaluation techniques are applied to study the relative profitability of the alternatives.
Selection of the projects; the next step it to select the alternatives by comparing the costs and benefits involved in each alternative.
Implementation: The next and crucial stage is immediate implementation of the selected proposal. Undue delays result in cost escalation. So that profitability project may turn out to be less profitable or unprofitable.   
Performance review: a continous monitoring of performance after the implementation of the project is imperative. So that expected and actual operating results are compared. These helps in taking corrective action against responsible persons.


Methods of capital budgeting;

There are two methods by which an investment opportunity or project can be evaluated. They are
1.      Traditional method:
a.      Pay-back period
b.      Average rate of return
2.      Discounted cash flow techniques:
a.      Net present value
b.      Profitability index
c.       Internal rate of return

Payback period:

”It indicates the period within which the cost of the project will be completely recovered. In the other words, it indicates the period within which the total cash inflows equal to the total cash outflows.”
The length of time required to recover the cost of an investment.”
It is defined as no. of years required to recover the initial investment.
It is perhaps the simplest method of looking at one or more investment projects or ideas. It focuses on receiving the cost of investments. It represents the amount of time that it takes for a capital budgeting project to recover its initial cost.

For example, if a project cost $100,000 and was expected to return $20,000 annually, the payback period would be $100,000 / $20,000, or five years.


Formula :

                                         The cost of project or investment
    Payback period =        --------------------------------------
                                               Annual cash inflows


Decision criteria:
 in case of independent projects the calculated pay back period should be compared with standard set by company. If the calculated payback period is less than the standard pay back period the project will be accepted otherwise rejected.
In case of mutually exclusive projects calculated payback period of alternatives are compared and the project which has lowest pay back period is accepted.


Merits :

Easy to compute ,
Easy to understand.
Simple to understand
It makes quite clear that there is no profit unless pay back period is over.
It costs less.
It helps to evaluate the projects which is uncertain

Demerits :
It ignores any benefits that occur after the payback period, and so does not measure total incomes.
It ignores time value of money.
It ignores inflation.

Shorter payback periods are obviously preferable to longer payback periods.


Conclusion: Because of these reasons, other methods of capital budgeting like net present value, internal rate of return or discounted cash flow are generally preferred

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Average rate of return (ARR)

.
The ratio of the average cash inflow to the amount invested.
This method is also known as accounting rate of return. As average of the net profit after taxes over the whole of the economic life of the projects are taken. Under this method returns is expressed as percentage of capital. It is based on the concept of rate of return

Formula:

Average profit after depreciation and taxes / average investments in the project.

Procedure for calculating ARR;

Step 1: average investment or average outflow
Initial asset cost+installation exp-salvage value/2+salvage value+ additional working capital.
Step 2; average profit=opening PADT+closing PADT/2
Step 3: ARR= step1/step2*100


Decision criteria:
In case of independent projects, calculated ARR should be compared with standard ARR. If it is more calculated accept otherwise reject.
In case of mutually exclusive project, both projects should be compared and highest ARR should be accepted.
In case of capital rationing, project with highest ARR should be ranked first.

Merits:

It is simple to calculate and easy to understand
It uses entire earnings of the project in calculating ARR
It can be calculated from the accounting data

Demerits:

It ignores time value of money
It ignores the timing of returns
It does not take into consideration cash inflows
It is not suitable for investments in parts

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Discounted cash flow techniques or modern techniques

Net present value {NPV}

This method is generally considered to be modern and the latest method for calculating capital budgeting proposals.
It can be defined as excess of present value of cash inflows over the present value of cash outflows. It takes into consideration time value of money and attempts to calculate the return on investments by introducing the factors of time element.

Procedure for calculating NPV

Step 1: calculating present value of cash outflows

            Year                outflow           pvf@10%etc   pv of outflow


                                                                                    Total pv of outflows=
Step 2: calculating present value of cash inflows

Year   inflows    pvf@-%  pv of inflows



                                         Total pv of inflows=

Step 3: calculating NPV
     
           NPV=step 2 – step 1


Decision criteria:

For individual projects Accept positive NPV and reject negative NPV
In mutually exclusive projects, two projects are compared and highest NPV is selected
In capital rationing the project having maximum positive NPV will be ranked first.

Merits:

It considers time value of money
It considers cash inflows from the project throughout its life
It takes into consideration the objective of wealth maximization to the shareholders

Demerits:

It is difficult to use, calculate and understand
It presupposes that the discounting ratio that is cost of capital is known. But cost of capital is difficult to measure in practice.
It may give dissatisfactory results with unequal investments


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Profitability index:

It is a ratio between total discounted cash inflows and total discounted cash outflows. It is also known as benefit cost ratio method. It measures the relationship between present value of cash inflows and present value of cash outflows

Formula: Present value of cash inflows/present value of cash outflows

Decision criteria:

The proposal is accepted if PI is more than 1 and rejected in case of it is less than 1. In case of mutual exclusive projects and capital rationing situation projects are ranked in order of their PI and accepted.

MERITS

This method is slightly modification of NPV. NPV is an absolute measure where as PI is an relative method used to judge profitability of project

The other advantages and disadvantages are same as NPV. The only difference is PI can be used to rank the projects even in case of projects with different size which is not possible in case of NPV method.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Internal rate of return {IRR}

IRR is the rate at which the discounted cash inflows match with discounted cash outflows the indication given by IRR is that this is the maximum rate at which the company will be able to pay towards the interest on the amounts borrowed for investing in the projects with out losing any thing. Thus, IRR may also be called as break even rate of borrowing for the company. In simple words IRR indicates that discounting rate at which NPV is 0.

Procedure for calculating IRR

Step 1: calculate present value of outflow
Step 2; calculate present value of inflows
Step 3; calculate NPV
Note: if calculated NPV is positive, select higher rate of return
          if calculated NPV is negative, select lower rate of return
Step 4: calculate present value of outflow at selected rate
Step 5; calculate present value of inflows at selected rate
Step 6; calculate NPV
Step 7; calculate IRR

Lower rate of return + pv value of inflows at l.r.- pv of outflows/pv of inflows at l.r-pv of inflows at h.r*{HR-LR}


Decision criteria:

If calculated IRR is greater than cost of capital, accept the project
If calculated IRR is less than cost of capital, reject the project.
In mutually exclusive compare and take highest IRR

Merits;
It takes into account time value of money
It considers profitability of projects for entire economic life
It provides uniform ranking
It is more reliable in case of wealth maximization


Demerits;

It is difficult to use, calculate and understand
The results may differ when projects differ in size, life and timing of cash flows

It pre assumes that the cash inflows can be reinvested immediately to yield the return equivalent to the cost of capital. Same with NPV also.

No comments:

Post a Comment